IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89007 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Kanhaiya Kumar Son of Naval Kishor Pandey Resident of Moldiyar Tola P.S -Mokama, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ajay Mahto son of Late Naresh Mahto village- maranchi Mushahari Tola, ps- Maranchi, Dist- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumar Manglam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P. Mr. AK Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the complainant. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 420, 406, 409, 467 and 468 the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, informant took loan through the petitioner to purchase a tempoo on 5.9.2017. However, after two years, when tempoo met with an accident, he discovered that vehicle was registered in the name of one Narayan Mistri instead of his name. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner was merely an agent of a Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89007 of 2024(5) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 Mahindra show room and he has no role in the alleged fraudulent transaction. Moreover, present litigation is outright of a civil nature for which civil remedies are available with the informant. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the State and the complainant oppose the prayer for bail. He submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he, by committing fraud, made available papers of the tempoo in the name of the informant. However, on inquiry from the Transport office, it was found that the tempoo was registered in the name of said Narayan Mistri. 6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T