IN TH 131 Tejpal Kau State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. appropriate Mandamus petitioner, Operator Regularizat continuous the Hon’bl reported as 31.12.2025 titled Jogi consequent CWP-25372-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.25372 o Date of decision al Kaur Versus of Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Anil Bidhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ pet opriate writ, order or direction, particu damus, directing the respondents to re ioner, a Group 'C' employee working ator under the Haryana Govern larization Policy dated 01.10.2003 nuous service of more than ten years, on’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo v. U rted as 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3826 2.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court i Joginder v. State of Haryana an equential service benefits, includin 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5372 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-13.08.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA , DAG, Haryana. rit petition is for issuance of an particularly a writ in the nature of s to regularize the services of the orking on the post of Computer overnment, in terms of the 0.2003, keeping in view his years, as well as the judgment of v. Union of India and others, 3826, and the judgment dated Court in CWP No.31304 of 2025 and another, along with all cluding continuity of service, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 10.35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document seniority, p accordance 2. that the p against the Thereafter with the r continuous submits tha in Jaggo v OnLine SC The petitio this regard However, n 3. stage, the p disposed of of the petit 02.4.2026 Jaggo’s ca 4. 5. on behalf o in case the is accepted CWP-25372-2026 (O & M) rity, pay fixation, arrears and all oth rdance with law. Learned counsel for the peti the petitioner is working with the st the sanctioned post and had firs eafter from 10.10.2014, the petitioner the respondent Department. As nuously worked for more than 10 its that in terms of the judgment of th go v. Union of India and others e SC 3826, he is liable to be cons petitioner has made several representat regard including Legal Notice dated 0 ever, no response has been received fr Learned counsel for the petit , the petitioner shall be satisfied if th sed of with a direction to the respond e petitioner for regularization and deci .2026 (Annexure P-6) in terms of ’s case (supra). Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG ehalf of respondent-State and submits se the limited prayer made by learned cepted. 2 all other admissible benefits, in e petitioner inter alia submits th the respondent Department ad first joined on 01.12.2012. itioner is in continuous service As such the petitioner has 10 years. Learned counsel t of the Hon’ble Supreme Court thers, reported as 2024 SCC e considered for regularization. esentations to the respondents in ated 02.4.2026 (Annexure P-6). ived from the respondents. e petitioner submits that at this d if the present writ petition is espondents to consider the case d decide the Legal Notice dated s of the judgment passed in , DAG, Haryana accepts notice bmits that he has ‘no objection’ arned counsel for the petitioner VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 10.35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6. 7. the parties, direction to fresh cons regularizati (Annexure period of judgment o as judgmen (supra). 8. August 13 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CWP-25372-2026 (O & M) Heard. Accordingly, with the consen arties, present Civil Writ Petition sta tion to the State of Haryana/concern consideration to the claim of eac larization and to decide the Legal exure P-6); and pass a speaking o d of 08 months from today, whi ment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jag dgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 Pending application(s) if any a 3, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 consent of learned counsel for ion stands disposed of, with a oncerned Department to accord each of the petitioner for Legal Notice dated 02.4.2026 ing order thereupon within a while keeping in mind the Jaggo’s case (supra) as well 5.2026 in Deepak Singh’s case f any also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 10.35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document