Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2617 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2024 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas ======================================================
1. Uma Kunwar W/O Late Yogeshwar Sao R/O Vill. and P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. 2. Rajo Devi W/O Ram Narian Bari @ Ram Narain Bari R/O Vill. and P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. 3. Sheema Devi @ Seema Kunwar W/O Late Ayodhya Gosai R/O Vill.- Chamartoli, Tilauthu, P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. 4. Pramod Kumar Mehta @ Pramod Mehta S/O Hari Narian Mehta @ Hari Narain Mehta R/O Vill.- Chamraha, Tilauthu, P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. 5. Bhagirathi Chaudhari S/O Late Dukhan Chaudhari R/O Vill.- Tilauthu, P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. 6. Rinki Devi W/O Ramji @ Avinash Chandravanshi R/O Vill.- Tilauthu, P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. 7. Ram Narain Bari @ Narain Bari @ Ram Narayan Prasad S/O Mundar Bari R/O Vill.- Tilauthu, P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. 8. Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Goshwami S/O Late Ayodhya Gosainm R/O Vill.- Chamartoli, Tilauthu, P.S.- Tilauthu, Dist.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alka Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 3 09-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 384, 385, 386 and 427 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution story in brief is that on 30.06.2024
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2617 of 2025(3) dt.09-05-2025 2/3 at around 08:30 PM, while the informant was working on farmland, in the meantime, around 300 people, allegedly led by Pramod Kumar Mehta (petitioner no. 4) and others, carrying weapons and CPI-ML flags, stormed the land and tried to forcibly occupy it. It is further alleged that when the informant resisted, the mob became violent, chased and assaulted them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the allegations leveled against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that there is no specific allegation against any of the petitioners of assault. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that there are criminal antecedents against petitioner nos.
2,4,5,6,7 and 8 but they are all members of mob and no specific allegation is alleged against any one of them. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. After perusing the Case Diary, learned A.P.P. for the State submits that there is a general and omnibus allegation against all the petitioners. There is no specific allegation against any of the petitioners of assault. Although there are criminal antecedents against petitioner nos. 2,4,5,6,7 and 8 but since they
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2617 of 2025(3) dt.09-05-2025 3/3 are all members of mob and no specific allegation is alleged against any one of them. Under these circumstances, the petitioners are granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 182 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Gaurav Sinha/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U T