MOHAMMAD NUMAN AAREFULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
APPLN/485/2025 · 2025-07-08
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8629 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8629 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
cria-485.25 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 132 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 485 OF 2025 MOHAMMAD NUMAN AAREFULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Shaikh Mohd. Ibrahim Ismail Advocate for Applicant. Mr. N.R. Dayama, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1. Ms. Namita P. Thole Advocate for Resp. No.2 (Appointed). ...
CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 8th JULY 2025
ORDER :
1. Learned Advocate for the applicants submits that since his clients are not contacting him, he has filed pursis for withdrawal of his appearance. It appears that he has adhered to the process and therefore, his appearance is discharged.
2. Before dismissing the application, we want to give a chance to the applicants to engage another Advocate if they want. The applicants are at liberty to engage another Advocate of their choice on or before 23rd July 2025. If any Advocate
cria-485.25 2 causes appearance on their behalf on or before that date, then place the matter for further consideration on 1st August 2025.
3. In case of failure on the part of the applicants to engage another Advocate within the said stipulated period, the Application would stand dismissed automatically without further reference to this Court.
4. In the event of conditional order coming into force, learned Advocate appointed for the cause of respondent No.2, be paid an amount of Rs.5000/-, by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad.
[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE asb/JULY25