Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86280 (KAR)

SMT.GOWRAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/240/2025 · 2025-12-18

Jyoti M

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54262 RP No. 240 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REVIEW PETITION NO. 240 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT.GOWRAMMA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O SRI. SHIVANNA, EX-TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCILLOR, R/AT CHANNAPATNA TOWN MUNICIPALITY, CHANNAPATNA - 571501, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/AT NO.1552/A, V.T. STREET FORT, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 571501. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYAN MAYYAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.R.HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF REVENUE MULTI STOREYED BUILDING BENGALURU - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT 2ND FLOOR, MAHADESHWARA VARTHA BHAVAN, ALUR VENKATARAO ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU - 560018 Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54262 RP No. 240 of 2025 3. THE TAHASILDAR AND MUZARAI OFFICER CHANNAPATNA TALUK, CHANNAPATNA - 571501 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 571511 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARAM SUB DIVISION, RAMANAGARA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 571511 6. SRI. VARADARAJASWAMY TEMPLE SEVA SAMITHI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, N.R. KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O LATE RANGACHAR, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, FORT, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 571501 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS REVIEW PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Narayan Mayyar, counsel on behalf of Sri.S.R.Hegde Hudlamane, for the petitioner appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed stating that the review petition may - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54262 RP No. 240 of 2025 be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition. The oral submission and memo is placed on record. 3. Resultantly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12