- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54467 RP No. 582 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REVIEW PETITION NO.582 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. G. SANTHIRAM AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O P.K. GOPALAN, R/AT NO.383/B, RAILWAY OFFICERS QUARTERS, MG RAILWAY COLONY, MAGADI ROAD POST, BENGALURU-560023. 2. G. VASUNDARA LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, W/O S. VENKATARAMUDU, R/AT NO.385, 38TH A CROSS 26TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560069. G.P.A. HOLDER SRI S. SUNIL KUMAR R/AT NO.385, 38TH A CROSS 26TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560069. 3. M. HAROONAL RASHEED AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, S/O LATE MAXHAULHAKH, RESIDING AT NO.26/2, 1ST CROSS, MARAPPA GARDEN, BENSON TOWN POST, BENGALURU-560046. 4. SMT. PUSHPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, W/O K. LAKSHMAN, R/AT NO.190/17, 18TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK JAYANAGAR, Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54467 RP No. 582 of 2025 BENGALURU-560011 G.P.A. HOLDER SRI RAKESH LAKSHMAN R/AT NO.190/17, 18TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI K.B.S. MANIAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI BASI REDDY JAYRAMI REDDY S/O B. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT LINGAREDDY PALLI VILLAGE, KALSAPADU MANDAPAM, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-516210. 2. SRI KOPOLU NARASIMHA REDDY S/O LATE KOPPOLUJAGAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.7-4-76, CHEMUDUR, CHENNAMPALLI PANCHAYITI, BADAVEL MANDAMALA, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-516210. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE ELECTRICTY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED K-1 SUB-DIVISION, 1 FLOOR, T.T.M.C. BUILDING, KENGERI, BANGALORE-560060. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10.10.2025 PASSED IN W.P.NO.25959/2025 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54467 RP No. 582 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the Review Petition and files a memo to that effect. The memo reads as under : “Memo of withdrawal The undersigned herein humbly submits that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above Review Petition as withdrawn in the interest of Justice and Equity.” 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52