Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86269 (KAR)

SAROJAMMA v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

MFA/9588/2015 · 2025-07-16

B M Shyam Prasad, G Basavaraja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26304-DB MFA No. 9588 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9588 OF 2015 (MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. SAROJAMMA W/O. SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SHANKARAPPA S/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED 60 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT HIRISAVE VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573118. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VEDHU KUMAR Y S.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO. 48/2, 2ND FLOOR ST. MARKS ROAD ABOVE K.C. DAS SWEETS BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. R.S.RAMANUJAM RAMANUJAM MATHRUCHAYA, BEHIND NAGARAJA GARDEN, AYODHYA NAGAR, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26304-DB MFA No. 9588 of 2015 J.P.NAGAR, 5TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.V. HEGDE MULKHAND., ADVOCATE FOR R1 (ABSENT); SRI. B.S. RAVIKIRAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (ABSENT)) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 1.3.2011 PASSED IN MVC NO.7837/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, MACT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD) This Court's previous order reads as under: "None appears for the appellant and to extend a final opportunity given that the appeal is being listed after almost three years, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26304-DB MFA No. 9588 of 2015 the office is directed to re-list this appeal on 16.07.2025." None appears for the appellant despite the opportunity. This Court is persuaded to opine that there is lack of interest and hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE SA ct:sr