Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:141744 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9234 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Aneeta Respondent :- Nitin And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mridul Chandra Tiwari,Vatsala Upadhyay Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"direct the Civil Judge (S.D.), Muzaffar Nagar to decide the 6C Application in O.S.No.609/2025 pending before Civil Judge (S.D.) Muzaffar Nagar in between Smt. Aneeta Vs. Nitin and others within the time to be specified by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Muzaffar Nagar to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad