Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[149]
Manvi and another
State of Haryana and anothers
Coram :
Present:
SANJAY VASHISTH
[1]
226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 & 5. [2]
residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a petitio before the Court having jurisdiction to entertain the prayer. [3]
31.07.2025 ‘R. Sharma'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8293 Date of Decision : 31.07.2025
Manvi and another
versus State of Haryana and anothers
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Mr. Kartik, Advocate
for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Madan, Sr. DAG, Punjab. ****
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL)
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 & 5. Since both the petitioners and private respondents are residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a petitio before the Court having jurisdiction to entertain the prayer. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 31.07.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8293-2025 Decision : 31.07.2025
…Petitioners
….Respondents SANJAY VASHISTH Mr. Neeraj Madan, Sr. DAG, Punjab. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 & 5. Since both the petitioners and private respondents are residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a petition with similar relief before the Court having jurisdiction to entertain the prayer. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(SANJAY VASHISTH)
JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life Since both the petitioners and private respondents are residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal n with similar relief RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.02 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document