Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86251 (PNJ)

MANVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8293/2025 · 2025-07-31

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[149] Manvi and another State of Haryana and anothers Coram : Present: SANJAY VASHISTH [1] 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 & 5. [2] residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a petitio before the Court having jurisdiction to entertain the prayer. [3] 31.07.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8293 Date of Decision : 31.07.2025 Manvi and another versus State of Haryana and anothers HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Mr. Kartik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Madan, Sr. DAG, Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 & 5. Since both the petitioners and private respondents are residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a petitio before the Court having jurisdiction to entertain the prayer. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 31.07.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8293-2025 Decision : 31.07.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents SANJAY VASHISTH Mr. Neeraj Madan, Sr. DAG, Punjab. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 & 5. Since both the petitioners and private respondents are residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a petition with similar relief before the Court having jurisdiction to entertain the prayer. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to protect the life Since both the petitioners and private respondents are residents of Delhi, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal n with similar relief RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.02 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document