Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8625 (KAR)

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. BASANAGOUDA VIRUPAKSHAGOUDA PATIL

MFA/101535/2021 · 2025-01-29

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101535 OF 2021 (MV-I) BETWEEN: 1 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MLBC, NAVILUTEERTA, DIVISION NO.2, SAVADATTI-591126, DIST. BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K.S.PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . BASANAGOUDA VIRUPAKSHAGOUDA PATIL AGE 69 YEARS, R/O, KADROLLI-591153, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST.BELAGAVI. 2 . THE SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER MALAPRABHA PROJECT NO.3, BAGALKOT-587101. 3 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY THE PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. ... RESPONDENTS * * * * * 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 74 of Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 against the Judgment and Award dated 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 passed in LAC No.876/2018 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Belagavi. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Two weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections. Failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 20.03.2025, the Advocate for appellants has not complied with the office objection. Hence, this MFA No. 101535 of 2021 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 29.01.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: nth C By: sdp