SHAHNAZA AYOUB v. GOVERNMENT OF J AND K AND ORS. (URBAN LOCAL BODIES)
WP(C)/2157/2023 · 2025-07-28
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8625 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8625 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 50 Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2157/2023 CM(5029/2023).
SHAHNAZA AYOUB.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Lone Altaf, Advocate.
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT OF J AND K AND ORS.
Through: Mr. Illyas Laway, GA for R1 to 4. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Advocate for R-5.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 28.07.2025
01. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a copy of order No. DULB/Acctts/3332/493 of 2024 dated 21.10.2024, whereby sanction has been accorded to the grant of family pension in favour of the petitioner-Shahnaza Ayoub. The authenticity of this order has been confirmed by learned counsel appearing for official respondents No.1 to 4. The document is taken on record.
02. Through the medium of present petition, the petitioner has sought a direction upon the respondents for finalization and grant of family pension from the date of death of her husband, who had died in harness on
20.05.2023. Since, respondent No. 2 has already issued the order dated 21.10.2024 (supra), as such grievance of the petitioner standsredressed.
03. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3 to forward the family pension case of the petitioner to respondent
No. 5 in accordance with the law. Upon receipt of the pension case, respondent No. 5 shall issue pension payment order in favour of the petitioner. The whole exercise shall be completed by respondents No. 3 to 5 within a period of two months from today.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 28.07.2025 Bisma