Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8624 (UTT)

SANTRAM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1536/2021 · 2025-03-17

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1775 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1536 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. No representation for petitioner. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painuli and Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holders for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 & 2. 3. No representation for respondent No.3. 4. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the FIR No.358 of 2021 dated 11.08.2021 registered with Police Station Vikasnagar, District Dehradun under Section 420 IPC and under Section 3 of SC/ST Act. 5. It is contended by the learned State Counsel that after investigation, final report has already been filed by the police on 22.09.2021 against the petitioner-Sant Ram, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it becomes infructuous. 6. The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 8. Interim order dated 23.08.2021 stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.03.2025 PN