Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86234 (PAT)

Chhotu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2065/2025 · 2025-03-19

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2065 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2024 Thana- PIRI BAZAR District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Chhotu Kumar S/O Basudeo Yadav @ Basu Yadav Resident of Village- Farda, PS- Safiya Sarai, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.N. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 19-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.N. Pamdey, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant along with his family members was going on e-rickshaw from Abhaipur Railway Station. Near Kothia Tal, four persons on three bikes intercepted them and took away valuables and mobile. It is also stated by the informant that he can identify the accused persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2065 of 2025(4) dt.19-03-2025 2/2 petitioner was never put on TIP and from the order of the trial court also, it is clear that though it has been written down that there is involvement of this petitioner which has surfaced during investigation. As the informant has stated that he can identify the petitioner but no TIP has been conducted as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.04.2024. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Piribazar P.S. Case No. 48 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Lakhisarai. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T