Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86221 (ALL)

PRIYANKA TRIPATHI v. RAHUL PAWAR, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

CAPL/5321/2024 · 2025-10-06

Dinesh Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5321 of 2024 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Sole respondent has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 2. Learned Standing Counsel representing the sole respondent states that the representation moved by the present applicant has been decided, by order dated 6.10.2025, in compliance of the order dated 17.1.2024, therefore, instant application may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In this view of the matter, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 7, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Birendra Kaushik Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Priyanka Tripathi .....Applicant(s) Rahul Pawar, District Basic Education Officer .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad