SANJAY AGGARWAL v. UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT) (LADAKH CASE)
CRM(M)/415/2023 · 2025-09-02
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8622 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8622 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 44 Regular Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 415/2023 CrlM(1012/2023) SANJAY AGARWAL.
..…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH AND ORS.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Yasmeen Jan, Advocate vice Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI for R1&3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 02.09.2025
1. The record reveals that for the last two consecutive dates, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and same is the position today as well. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction if any shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR 02.09.2025 Sabreena Rahim