RSA-4521- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 Pyara Singh (since deceased) through his LRs and others Rattan Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) concurrent judgments and decrees of both suit for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed. was issued way hearing i.e. on gone un-represented. Today for the 4 behalf of the appellan have exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the interest of justice. O utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that -2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Pyara Singh (since deceased) through his LRs and others Versus Rattan Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff-appellants are concurrent judgments and decrees of both the Courts below suit for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed. The matter pertains to the year was issued way back on 16.08.2017. Perusal of the order-sheets reveals hearing i.e. on 20.09.2018, 23.10.2019 and 25.03.2022 represented. Today for the 4th time, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, despite the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4521-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.03.2025 Pyara Singh (since deceased) through his LRs and others .… Appellants .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA in second appeal against the the Courts below whereby their suit for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed. The matter pertains to the year 2013 and notice of motion sheets reveals that on the last 03 dates of 20.09.2018, 23.10.2019 and 25.03.2022, the appellants had time, there is no representation on despite the case having been called twice. g of the above facts shows that the appellants exhibited an utterly casual attitude in their pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellants in n the other hand, the appellants have adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellants in second appeal against the whereby their of motion the last 03 dates of had time, there is no representation on pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the in adopted an RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.21 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-4521- nor their counsel Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to non-prosecution. 20.03.2025 rishu -2013 (O&M) -2- counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. the same for RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.21 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.