FIRDOUS AHMAD GANAIE v. JAMMU AND KASHMIR GRAMEEN BANK AND ORS.
WP(C)/1935/2025 · 2025-08-19
Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8621 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8621 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 1 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 1935/2025 CM No. 5126/2025
Firdous Ahmad Ganaie …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mir Umar, Advocate Vs. Jammu and Kashmir Grameen Bank and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Shakir Haqani, Advocate CORAM:
HON’BLE MS JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
O R D E R 19.08.2025
Petitioner, in this writ petition, challenges the order dated 04.06.2025, passed by District Magistrate, Baramulla, under Section 14(i)(a) of the SARFEASI Act, whereby Tehsildar, Baramulla, has been directed to take possession of secured assets of petitioner after proper verification and fulfilment of all required formalities. Mr. Shakir Haqani, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank, submits that the Respondent-Bank has taken possession of secured assets of petitioner, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. His statement is taken on record. In view of statement made by learned counsel for Respondent-Bank, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE
SRINAGAR 19.08.2025 Manzoor
Manzoor Ul Hassan Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Srinagar 20.08.2025 17:10