109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21956-2025 Decided On: 22.08.2025 KUSUM MOR .....PETITIONER(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to sanction the expenditure incurred by the petitioner on the medical treatment of her mother-in-law, regarding which she has made a representation dated 29.12.2024, Annexure P-10, as well. 2. Learned State counsel contends that the Department has considered and rejected the petitioner’s case and appropriate order to that effect will be conveyed to her within six weeks. 3. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one challenging the order. 4. Permitted to do so. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 22.08.2025 JUDGE Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No Aman Dua 2025.08.26 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document