Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 862 (MEG)

M/S. M.D. CONSTRUCTIONS AND ANR. v. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/207/2025 · 2025-07-16

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 207 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.07.2025 1. M/s M.D. Constructions, a registered partnership firm having its registered place pf Business at Fancy Valley, Tura P.O. Tura,West Garo Hills, Meghalaya-794001 and Represented by one of its partners, Shri Bikash Harlalka, S/o Shri Ram Gopal Harlalka, aged about 48 years, R/o Fancy Valley, Tura, P.O. Tura,West Garo Hills, Meghalaya-794001. 2. Shri Bikash Harlalka, S/o Shri Ram Gopal Harlalka, one of the partners of M/s M.D. Constructions, R/o Fancy Valley, Tura, P.O. Tura,West Garo Hills, Meghalaya-794001 … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State Bank of India, State Bank Bhavan, Madame Cama Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400021, Represented by its Chairman 2. State Bank of India, Tura Bazar (Evening Branch), Tura Bazar, T.D. Road, P.O. Tura, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya-794001 represented by its Chief Manager/ Branch Manager. 3. The Chief Manager/Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Tura Bazar (Evening Branch), Tura Bazar, T.D. Road, P.O. Tura, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya-794001. 2025:MLHC:612 4. Shri Gaurav Harlalka, S/o Shri Ram Gopal Harlalka, one of the partners of M/s M.D. Constructions, R/o Fancy Valley, Tura, P.O. Tura,West Garo Hills, Meghalaya-794001 ….. Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Sharma, Adv. with Mr. B. Snaitang, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Pandey, Adv. (For R 1-3) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: (ORAL) 1. Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the respondent No. 4, have since reconciled outside the Court with regard to the operation of the Accounts of the business. He prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ application. 2. Mr. S. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent State Bank of India submits that if that is the case, the Bank will have no objection, in defreezing the Accounts of the petitioner No. 1. 2025:MLHC:612 3. On the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the matter stands closed on withdrawal, and is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Meghalaya 16.07.2025 “V. Lyndem-PS” 2025:MLHC:612 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2025.07.16 15:58:22 IST