Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86194 (KAR)

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR v. SRI N NARAYANA

RP/16/2025 · 2025-09-11

V Srishananda

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36022 RP No. 16 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REVIEW PETITION NO. 16 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR CAUVERY NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED, AMBEDKAR BEEDI, COFFEE BOARD BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, (SOUTH) MYSORE, PALACE BUILDING, MYSORE - 570 024. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, II V C C DIVISION, CAUVERY BHAVAN COMPLEX, GOKULAM 4TH STAGE, YADAVAGIRI, MYSORE - 570 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.S. BHEEMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI N NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE NAGA GOWDA, RESIDING AT DEVARASANAHALLI Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36022 RP No. 16 of 2025 KASABA HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-570 001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, (VIKASA SOUDHA), DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE. BY ITS (A)CHIEF SECRETARY AND (B) SECRETARY TO IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. GOPALKRISHNA SOODI, AGA FOR R2) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC. 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 05.09.2024 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN RFA NO.1537/2015 (MON), WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A AND MODIFY THE SAME, IN VIEW OF THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AS STATED ABOVE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36022 RP No. 16 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Heard on the merits of the review petition. 2. According to learned counsel for the review petitioner, in paragraph No.11 of Ex.P2, this Court has observed that there is no time fixed, but there is a fixation of time of four months in Ex.P2 and therefore, matter needs to be reconsidered. 3. Accepting the reasons mentioned on behalf of the review petitioner, this Court pass the following : ORDER i) The review petition is allowed. ii) RFA No.1537/2015 is restored to its file. iii) List RFA No.1537/2015 on 18.09.2025. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20