CHANDRA BHUSAN PANDEY v. ADARSH SINGH- EXCISE COMMISSIONER
CAPL/4230/2025 · 2025-09-21
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86194 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86194 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4230 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Case was taken up under the category of Personal Appearance cases. Learned counsel for the applicant is not present whereas learned standing counsel is present.
2. Today, learned standing counsel has filed compliance affidavit of opposite party, which is taken on record. On the basis of compliance affidavit, he submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with.
3. I have perused the compliance affidavit. From the perusal of same, it is clear that order of Writ Court has been complied with.
4. Under such facts of the case, no further order is required to be passed.
5. Accordingly, file is consigned to the record.
6. In case, any part of order of Writ Court is still remains to be complied with, liberty is given to the applicant to move recall application within 30 days. September 22, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Chandra Bhusan Pandey .....Applicant(s) Adarsh Singh- Excise Commissioner .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad