Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86174 (PNJ)

POOJA RANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8363/2025 · 2025-08-02

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8363 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 106 Pooja Rani and another State of Haryana Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos. protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 & 5 and their relatives. 2. are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 & 5. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 & 5. Their marriage certificate and photographs evidencing their marriage is on record Annexure P 28.07.2025 (Annexure P 3. 4. the respondent 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no 8363-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Pooja Rani and another Versus State of Haryana and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Lalit K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos. protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 & 5 and their relatives. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 & 5. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 & 5. Their marriage certificate and photographs evidencing their marriage is on record Annexure P-4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated .07.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent no. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Superintendent of Police, District - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8363-2025 Decided on:02.08.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 & 5 and their relatives. l for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 & 5. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 & 5. Their marriage certificate and photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P-3 and 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 5) to respondent no.3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District Ambala, ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their l for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 & 5. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 & 5. Their marriage certificate and 3 and 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Ambala, to VINOD KUMAR 2025.08.02 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8363 decide the representation of one week from today liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marria August 02, 2025 vinod* 8363-2025 decide the representation to be made by the petitioners of one week from today and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marria , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - the petitioners to him within a period and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and hat this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES to him within a period and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and hat this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion VINOD KUMAR 2025.08.02 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document