Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138987 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29856 of 2025 Applicant :- Hanif Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nandini Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
1. Sri Satya Prakash, Advocate (AOR No.A/S 1723/24) holding brief of Ms. Nandini Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant on instructions received from his client submits that though the application u/s 528 BNSS has been preferred by the applicant for quashing the summoning order dated 03.05.2025 issued by learned Civil Judge (J.D.)-FTC/J.M. (against violence of Women) Court No.2, Bijnor in Complaint Case No.7202 of 2024 (Smt. Bushara Khatoon Vs. Mohd. Naim and others) U/s 498A, 307, I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P.Act, at P.S. Mahila Thaha, District Bijnor, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.)-FTC/J.M. (against violence of Women) Court No.2 Bijnor, however, he confines his relief only to the extent of enlargement of bail before the court below.
2. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
3. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the application stands disposed of granting liberty to the applicant to prefer appropriate proceedings/ application seeks bail before the court below, the same shall be considered with most expeditions strictly as per the law of the land without any delay.
4. In the opinion of the Court, once a bail application is preferred then the same shall be considered with most expeditions strictly as per the law of the land without any delay. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 piyush Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad