- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43208 WP No. 9488 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 9488 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMI RAGHAVAN D/O. LATE SRI. PATTABHI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT AGRAJA NILAYA, NO. 2032/16, 5TH BLOCK, SIR M VISHWEASHWARAIAH LAYOUT, NEAR PATEL CHANNAMALLAPPA BUILDING, ULLALU UPANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 056. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. K B NAVEEN KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHASILDAR OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHINTAMANI, CHIKKALLABAPURA-563 125. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43208 WP No. 9488 of 2024 3. SRI. PATTABHI VENKATAKUMAR S/O. LATE SRI. PATTABHI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 437, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 9TH BLOCK, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560 072. 4. SRI. P. NAGABHUSHAN S/O. LATE SRI. PATTABHI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT HEBBIRI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DTD 11.07.2023 VIDE BEARING NO. RRT/DTS/120/2022-23 ISSUED BY THE R-2 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE R-2 TO REGISTER THE KHATHA IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE REGISTERED WILL AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43208 WP No. 9488 of 2024 2. Petitioner has called in question the correctness of the order at Annexure-A relating to katha entry. 3. Taking note that the order passed by the Tahsildar is an original order and the same is appealable in terms of the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, the petitioner is relegated to avail the appeal remedy under Section 49 of the Act. All contentions are kept open. 4. Issuance of notice to respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with in light of relegating the petitioner to avail of the appeal remedy. 5. Accordingly, petition is disposed of. Office to return the certified copy of the documents, if any after retaining Xerox copies of the same for reference. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP