IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89073 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-713 Year-2024 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Deepak Singh @ Deepak Kumar Son of Kamta Prasad Singh @ Gandhi Ji Mohalla -A. G. colony PS -shastri nagar, District -Patna at present residing of Durga Ashram Gali B V college Shekhpura PS -shastri nagar District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabha Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State . 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 ( 2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 76, 144 ( 2 ), 79, 352, 351 ( 2 ), 3 (5) , 324 ( 4 ) and 303 ( 2 ) of BNS 2023 and Section 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise 2022 . 3 . As per the prosecution case , on 13.09.2024 , informant was taken to a party by all the F.I.R., named accused persons where all the accused persons forecfully laid down the informant on bed and she was undressed and obscene act was committed by her but somehow she managed to escape from there and lodged this present case . Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89073 of 2024(2) dt.21-01-2025 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . No such occurrence took place as alleged. As a matter of fact, informant is professional dancer who performs dance in private party and here she was engaged by co-accused Ankit and there might have dispute with him and as such she lodged this present case against co-accused Ankit and others including this petitioner. Allegation is general and omnibus. No specific overt act is alleged against this petitioner. 5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R and there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he along with other co-accused persons committed obscene acts and stolen cash from informant. 6. Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of offence , prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected. Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T