- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43811 WP No. 33041 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 33041 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. C V SANDESH S/O. C VENKATAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.66, 18TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, BTM 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 076. 2. SRI. C. V SANTOSH, S/O. C VENKATAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.66, 18TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, BTM 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HEGDE RAMAKRISHNA S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BBMP, N.R. SQUARE, J.C ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, BBMP, UTILITY BUILDING, NEAR MAYO HALL, BENGALURU - 560 004 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (MSN), R.S.PALYA, MARUTHISEVE NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 076. Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43811 WP No. 33041 of 2024 4. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, TOWN PLANNING (EAST), BENGALURU - 560 001. 5. MR. EYAS CHALIL, S/O. MR. ABOOBAKER, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SITE NO.7BM-301, HRBR, 1ST BLOCK, BENGALURU-560078. ALSO AT FLAT NO.102, 1ST FLOOR, NCN NEST, HANUMANTHAPPA ROAD, KAMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 084. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SAMIDHA PRADEEP WAINGANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO 4 TO INITIATE AN ACTION AGAINST THE R-5 FOR THE ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION PUT UP BY THE R-5 WITHOUT LEAVING THE SET- BACK TOWARDS THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONERS IN VIOLATION OF LICENSE AND SANCTIONED PLAN BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DTD 29.08.2024, 05.09.2024 AND 13.11.2024 AT ANNEXURE-A, B AND C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43811 WP No. 33041 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, in view of the action taken by Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike. 2. His submission is noted. In view of the said submission, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of dismissal of main petition, pending interlocutory applications if any do not survive for consideration and the same stand rejected. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14