[2025:RJ-JP:5533-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No. 3419/2020 Tasleem Ahmed Khan S/o Late Shri Mohammad Amin, Aged About 51 Years, R/o House No. 313, Almaas Anantpura, Kota (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary-Cum-Director, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, New Delhi. 2. The National Accreditation Board Of Hospitals And Healthcare Providers (Nabh), Through Quality Counsel Of India, Itbp Building, 5Th Floor, Ring Road, Ip Estate, New Delhi 110002. Through The Chairman 3. The Medical Council Of India And National Medical Commission, Pocket ,14 Sector 8 Dwarka Phase-1, New Delhi 110077. Through The Chairman. 4. The National Medical Commission, Through Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Department, Room 348, A Wing Nirman Bhawan New Delhi 110011. Through The Chairman. 5. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 6. The Honble Minister, Department Of Medical And Health, Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 7. The Director, Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Haris on behalf of Mr. Kaleem Ahamed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samaksh Dasot HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 07/02/2025 1. A prayer for adjournment has been made. [2025:RJ-JP:5533-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-3419/2020] 2. We find that on 25.03.2021, a statement was made that additional affidavit has been filed. However, office report shows that there is no such affidavit on record. 3. The case was earlier listed on 11.11.2024, but as no one represented, the case was adjourned. Today again, a prayer for adjournment is made. 4. On 09.04.2021, learned Additional Advocate General stated that other petition on the same issue is already pending consideration and prayed for tagging of the case along with the other matter. 5. We are of the view that once the issue has already been raised in a petition, there is no need to entertain another petition in the nature of PIL on the same issue. The issue raised in this petition shall be examined in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.391/2020. 6. Accordingly, this PIL petition is closed. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/29