APHC010093242009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 929/2009 Between: 1. PARCHURI SIVA RAMA KRISHNAIAH AND ANOTHER, S/O. NARAYANA CULTIVATION, R/O. BURRIPALEM NOW AT MALLEPADUGU CAMP, RAICHURU, 2. PARCHURI SUNDARA RAO (DIED), S/O. NARAYANA CULTIVATION, R/O. BURRIPALEM NOW AT MALLEPADUGU CAMP, RAICHURU, ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. PARCHURI BOSE AND 11 OTHERS, S/O. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, CULTIVATION, SARPANCH BURRIPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDALAM. 2. PARCHURI RAMBABU, S/O. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, BURRIPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDALAM. 3. PARCHURI SESHAMMA, W/O. LATE SAMBASIVA RAO, BURRIPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDALAM. 4. VALIVELA BHARATHI, W/O. BAPINEEDU C/O. U. KOTESWARA RAO, SAKHAMURI STREET, GANDHINAGAR, 5. PARCHUTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O. BOSE, EMPLOYEE BURRIPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDALAM 6. PARCHURI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O. RAMBABU EMPLOYEE BURRIPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDALAM 7. UMMALANENI JAYAPRADA, W/O. VENKATA RAMESH 2 BABU HOUSEWIFE NEAR RAILWAY STATION, DHONE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. NARRAVULA CHAITANYA, W/O. RAVI BABU HOUSEWIFE R/O. BURRIPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDALAM. 9. UMMALANENI VENKATA RAMESH BABU, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO, EMPLOYEE IN JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE'S COURT, DHONE, KURNOOL DSITRICT. 10. THOTA POLESWARI, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, HOUSEWIFE R/O. DOOR NO. 1-12-4, VELLANKIVARI STREET, NAZAR PET, 11. THE AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, NELAPADU BRANCH, TENALI MANDALAM. 12. PARCHURI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O. LATE PITCHAIAH (DIED) CULTIVATION, BURRIPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 1677 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.No. 177/2008 on the file of the District Judge, Guntur pending disposal of the above CMA Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. DEVINENI RADHA RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V L N SARMA This Court made the following: 3 JUDGMENT: Ms. Devineni Radha Rani, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that the cause in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal does not survive for adjudication and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 14th August, 2025 cbs 4 HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM C.M.A.No.929 of 2009 14th August, 2025 cbs