Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86124 (KAR)

LOGAN SETH PARKER v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/32503/2025 · 2025-12-08

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51681 WP No. 32503 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 32503 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: LOGAN SETH PARKER AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O BRIAN PARKER R/O HOUSE OF HIRANANDANI GLEN GATE B-1001 DEVINAGAR BANGALORE 560 094 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A S VISHWAJITH.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001 2. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS 74B SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51681 WP No. 32503 of 2025 3. FOREIGNERS REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICER BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 5TH FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, TTMC BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING K.H. ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BANGALORE 560 027 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO EXPEDITIOUSLY DISPOSE OF THE PETITIONERS APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION WITH APPLICATION ID 070525WYPO DATED 08.05.2025 ANNEXURE – E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent No.3 to expeditiously dispose of the petitioners application - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51681 WP No. 32503 of 2025 for registration with application ID 070525WYPO dated 08.05.2025 (Annexed as Annexure – E). b. Pass any such further orders as may be deemed just and expedient in the facts and circumstances of the present case, and in the interest of justice and equity. 2. A memo dated 24.11.2025 signed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner has been filed, which reads as under; “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL Counsel for the Petitioner craves leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file afresh, in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. Accepting the said memo and submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of dismissal of the main petition, pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration. Hence, the same are disposed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE KTY/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36