RSA-2062- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 Kishan Lal Nanda Naresh Behal CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) concurrent judgments and suit of the plaintiff was issued way hearing i.e. on 07.08.2019, 09.11.2022 and 15.02.2023 gone un-represented. Today for the 4 behalf of the appellant, has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. O casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel is -2016 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Kishan Lal Nanda Versus Naresh Behal CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellant. Mr. Dinesh Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendant-appellant is in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of both the Courts below whereby the suit of the plaintiff/respondent for possession The matter pertains to the year was issued way back on 27.07.2017. Perusal of the order-sheets reveals hearing i.e. on 07.08.2019, 09.11.2022 and 15.02.2023 represented. Today for the 4th time, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, despite the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant casual and careless approach. It is clear that seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2062-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.03.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Dinesh Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. in second appeal against the decrees of both the Courts below whereby the possession was decreed. The matter pertains to the year 2016 and notice of motion sheets reveals that for the last 03 dates of hearing i.e. on 07.08.2019, 09.11.2022 and 15.02.2023, the appellant had time, there is no representation on despite the case having been called twice. he above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in his pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the n the other hand, the appellant has adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant nor his seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this in second appeal against the decrees of both the Courts below whereby the of motion last 03 dates of , the appellant had time, there is no representation on pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the the adopted an utterly or his seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.21 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-2062- Court is left with n prosecution. 19.03.2025 rishu -2016 (O&M) -2- Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable o other option except to dismiss the same for non- Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.21 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.