IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86367 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Sachin Kumar son of Late Uttam Singh village -sinhma, tola no 10, PS -Muffasil District -Begusarai 2. Mahesh Sah son of Basudeo Sah @ Vasudeo Sah village- Baliya, Ward no. 9, Chaskhmakhan tolla, ps- Baliya, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Yugal Kishore, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rail Gaya (Gaya GRPS) P.S. Case No. 166 of 2024 dated 16.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 112 and 304 of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons are alleged to have snatched the golden chain of the informant from his neck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86367 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 against the petitioners. The petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioners has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused person. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged offence. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 17.07.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Gaya (Gaya GRPS) P.S. Case No. 166 of 2024. 7. The application stands allowed. Gautam/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T