Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86110 (MAD)

Prem Anand Manickam v. State rep.by its, Inspector of Police,

CRL MP/15756/2025 · 2025-08-20

G Jayachandran

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P. Nos.15756 and 15757 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.Nos.16712 and 16713 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.08.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.M.P. Nos.15756 and 15757 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.Nos.16712 and 16713 of 2025 Prem Anand Manikam ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.15756 of 2025 Nirmal Jayaraman ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.15757 of 2025 Vs. The State Rep. by its, The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Metro Wing, Egmore, Chennai-8. (Crime No.1 of 2025) .... Respondent in both cases For Petitioners : Mr.V.Balamurugan in both cases For Respondent : Mr. L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) in both cases ********* O R D E R These petitions have been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in para 8(c) in Crl.O.P.Nos.16712 and 16713 of 2025 dated 04.07.2025 that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30.a.m., until further orders. 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P. Nos.15756 and 15757 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.Nos.16712 and 16713 of 2025 Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN , J. nvi 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that though the petitioner is reporting before the respondent police daily, he is not disclosing the details required by the Investigating Officer for the purpose of investigation. 3. The case relates to child pornography, and while granting bail, this Court had specifically recorded that the accused/petitioners should co-operate with the investigation by surrendering their mobile phones and other electronic gadgets. However, it is now submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the petitioners have not surrendering their mobile phone and electronic gadgets. 4. Recording the same, these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. It is open to the respondent Police to move an appropriate application for cancellation of bail if the petitioners do not comply with the bail conditions. 20.08.2025 nvi To 1. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Metro Wing, Egmore, Chennai-8. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.M.P. Nos.15756 and 15757 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.Nos.16712 and 16713 of 2025 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P. Nos.15756 and 15757 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.Nos.16712 and 16713 of 2025 Crl.M.P. No.15758 of 2025 in Crl.O.P. No.22927 of 2024 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis