ROSHANI BANO AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/27340/2025 · 2025-08-12
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 86070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138444 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27340 of 2025 Petitioner :- Roshani Bano And Another Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Singh,Mohammad Qais,Neha Rani,Ramesh Chandra,Satyvendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No. 257 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station- Dhoomanganj, District- Prayagraj, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad