Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 86045 (ALL)

DR. RAMESH KUMAR SONKAR AND 12 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP, AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/11663/2025 · 2025-08-12

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:137711 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11663 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Ramesh Kumar Sonkar And 12 Others Respondent :- State Of Up, And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners have prayed for following reliefs: "i) a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents to forthwith grant promotion to the petitioners as Senior Medical Officer, Level-II and as Consultant in Level-III w.e.f. the date of their eligibility/date from which the first person junior than the petitioners has been so promoted, within a period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court. ii) a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents to sanction all consequential benefits arising on account of promotion as Senior Medical Officer in Level-II and as Consultant in Level-III including the arrears of salary, within a period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that the case of petitioners stands squarely covered by the judgment and order of this Court dated 22.03.2024 passed in Writ A No. 3613 of 2024. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that in the event this Court disposes this petition then liberty should rest with the respondent to decide the claim in accordance with law. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to make representation afresh within a period of four weeks from today annexing therewith copy of the judgment of this Court passed in Writ A No. 3613 of 2024 to the competent respondent authority who in turn shall look into and consider the grievance/ claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the production of certified copy of this order along with representation. 6. However, discretion is left with the respondent to consider whether judgment relied upon is applicable and whether petitioner is entitled for similar relief. Needless to add, the order to be passed shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad