IN TH 221 Joginder S Mohinder CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU appeal agai the judgme Civil Judge 13.5.2013 Hoshiarpur performanc appellant/p stage of ad issuing not matter has RSA-4331-2013 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.4 Date of decision :-14.02.2025 nder Singh Versus inder Singh and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate fo Mr. Kashmir Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Jyotika Behl, Advocate fo Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellant/plaintiff is in t al against the concurrent findings of t udgment and decrees dated 25.11.20 Judge (Jr. Divn.), Mukerian and the .2013 passed by the learned A iarpur, whereby the suit for posse rmance of agreement to sell dated llant/plaintiff has been dismissed. The matter pertains to the ye addressing arguments. The orde ng notice of motion on 07.3.2014, er has been listed for hearing, out of 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH l No.4331 of 2013 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellant …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA cate for vocate cate for ocate for the respondents. is in the present regular second gs of the learned Courts below in .11.2010 passed by the learned d the judgment and decree dated Additional District Judge, possession by way of specific dated 05.4.2001 filed by the the year 2013 and is still at the e order sheets shows that after 14, as many as nine times the out of which on four dates i.e. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.15 18.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 27.1.2015, representat 27.1.2016, matter was on request written req counsel for the arguing on the grou appellant h present litig of the Cou appellant in has adopte neither the in pursuing option exce February 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-4331-2013 (O & M) .2015, 21.7.2015, 05.4.2017 and 0 sentation on behalf of appellant and o .2016, 10.5.2016, 04.4.2018, 16.12. er was adjourned either on request of l quest of learned proxy counsel for th en request for adjournment has be sel for the appellant and the learned pr rguing counsel is seeking adjournmen e ground that the arguing counsel is no A bare reading of the abo llant has exhibited an utterly casual a nt litigation. It is to be appreciated tha e Court has been expended in affo llant in the interest of justice. On th dopted an utterly casual and careless er the applicant-appellant nor its coun rsuing the present matter. Thus, this n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, uary 14, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 and 04.4.2018 there was no and on rest of the five dates i.e. 16.12.2019 and 12.9.2022 the est of learned arguing counsel or l for the appellant. Even today as been circulated by learned proxy counsel appearing for nment to address the arguments el is not feeling well. e above facts shows that the sual attitude in the pursuit of the ed that very valuable public time n affording opportunities to the On the other hand, the appellant areless approach. It is clear that counsel are seriously interested s, this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.15 18.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document