Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85996 (ALL)

ACHCHHELAL YADAV v. RAJAI YADAV AND 9 OTHERS

A227/9095/2025 · 2025-08-13

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138687 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9095 of 2025 Petitioner :- Achchhelal Yadav Respondent :- Rajai Yadav And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Singh Yadav Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i) direct the learned court concerned to decide the 6-C application dated 30.08.2024 filed in Case No. 1255 of 2024 (Achchhelal Vs. Rajai Yadav) within stipulated period which is pending before the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) City, Jaunpur (Annexure No.2 to this petition)." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) City Jaunpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad