COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SRI CHHUTKAN ARYA KANYA VIDYALAY PATHSHALA SAMITI AND ANOTHER v. DEPUTY REGISTRAR FIRM SOCIETIES AND CHITS KANPUR REGION AND ANOTHER
WRIC/27521/2025 · 2025-08-22
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146248 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27521 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Sri Chhutkan Arya Kanya Vidyalay Pathshala Samiti And Another Respondent :- Deputy Registrar Firm Societies And Chits Kanpur Region And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Kumar Srivastava,Sanjeev Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayers:-
"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 24.5.2025, passed by Deputy Registrar, Firm Societies and Chits Kanpur Region, Kanpur the respondent no.1(Annexure No.4 to this writ petition). b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding respondent no.1 to decide the objection dated 4.8.2025 filed by petitioner no.2 pending before him."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted that he is not pressing the prayer (a) and only made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh objection before respondent no.1, Deputy Registrar, Firm Societies and Chits Kanpur Region, Kanpur and a direction may be issued to respondent no.1 to decide the same, expeditiously in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of State-respondent no.1 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has no objection on innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Deepak Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondent no.1 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Taking into consideration of the arguments advanced by learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and no objection made by learned Standing Counsel on the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to file a fresh objection before the respondent no.1, Deputy Registrar, Firm Societies and Chits Kanpur Region, Kanpur within one week from today. After receiving the said objection, the respondent no.1 is directed to pass an appropriate order on the same, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt of the said objection. 6.
With the aforesaid directions/ observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad