Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85979 (PNJ)

ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS v. VINEET GARG IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/3209/2024 · 2025-01-08

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS VINEET GARG IAS AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Mr. Pawan Kumar Longia, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA In terms of order respondents favour of petitioner Nos.1, 4 and 6 respectively whereby they have been found entitled for regularization. Learned counsel for respondent Alok Sheokand that the necessary appointment letters in favour of the aforesaid three petitioners as well as release of arrears in their favour shall be carried out within a per In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS Versus VINEET GARG IAS AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the Mr. Pawan Kumar Longia, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) In terms of order dated 13.02.2024, learned counsel for relies upon three orders dated 03. petitioner Nos.1, 4 and 6 respectively whereby they have been found entitled for regularization. Learned counsel for respondent Alok Sheokand, Assistant O/o Divisional Forest Officer, Kaithal informs that the necessary appointment letters in favour of the aforesaid three as well as release of arrears in their favour shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3209-2024 Date of Decision: January 08, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pawan Kumar Longia, DAG, Haryana. dated 13.02.2024, learned counsel for relies upon three orders dated 03.12.2024 passed in petitioner Nos.1, 4 and 6 respectively whereby they have been Learned counsel for respondents on instructions from Mr. , Assistant O/o Divisional Forest Officer, Kaithal informs that the necessary appointment letters in favour of the aforesaid three as well as release of arrears in their favour shall be carried iod of two weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners in case the needful is not done within the as per the undertaking, the petitioners would be 2024 January 08, 2025 dated 13.02.2024, learned counsel for passed in petitioner Nos.1, 4 and 6 respectively whereby they have been on instructions from Mr. , Assistant O/o Divisional Forest Officer, Kaithal informs that the necessary appointment letters in favour of the aforesaid three as well as release of arrears in their favour shall be carried s in case the needful is not done within the would be TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.10 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3209-2024 -2- at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. With respect to the remaining petitioners, they shall be at liberty to avail their alternative remedies in accordance with law. 08.01.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.10 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document