IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 329 FAO-27-2022 Decided on:10.07.2025 Pawan Kumar Bhardwaj . . . Appellant Versus Swarn Singh and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL PRESENT: None for the appellant. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. As per the report of the registry, notice could not be issued to the respondents due to non-filing of process fee. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the appellant. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Liberty is granted to the appellant to revive the appeal, in case, any cause of action survives. 5. Registry is directed to send the copy of the present order to the appellant on the address mentioned in the memo of parties. (VIKAS BAHL) 10.07.2025 JUDGE Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2025.07.11 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment