HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31804 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Petitioner and respondent no. 5 are real brothers. On the basis of an alleged Will, respondent no. 5 had got his name mutated in the revenue records in proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Against the mutation order, petitioner had preferred an appeal under Section 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which was dismissed. Thereafter, a revision has been filed by petitioner, which is pending consideration. 2. Though, this writ petition has been filed challenging both order passed under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as appellate order but during the argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is giving up his right to challenge both orders impugned before this Court at this stage and a direction may be issued to expedite the proceedings of revision, which is pending consideration. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon officer concerned to conclude the revisional proceedings initiated by petitioner, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 12, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mandavi, Rajesh Pathik Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Prem Shankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad