- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15390 MFA No. 106516 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 106516 OF 2024 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SHRI. SHIVAJI VISHNU CHAVAN, AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. NIPPANI, TAL.CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI – 591 237. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOK A. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. AMJAD KHAJASAB SHAIKH, AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, A. P 20 899, SWAMI MALA, ICHALAKARANGI, TAL. HATAKANAGALE, DIST. KOLHAPUR – 416 109. 1. SAYEED S/O. MAJID SHAIKH, AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, A/P SWAMI MALA KABNOOR, TAL. HATAKANAGALE, DIST. KOLHAPUR – 416 109. 2. RASHID S/O. MAJID SHAIKH, AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. A/P. 20/899, SWAMI MALA KABNOOR, TAL. HATAKANAGALE, DIST. KOLHAPUR – 416 109. 3. SAMSHAD ADAM MULLAY, AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, A/P 20/899, SWAMI MALA R/O. A/P. SWAMI MALA KABNOOR, TAL. HATAKANAGALE, DIST. KOLHAPUR – 416 109. GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15390 MFA No. 106516 of 2024 4. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO., LTD CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI – 59 0001. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO COURT THAT THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 24.09.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.405/2013 BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT NIPPANI IN AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.1,52,060/- WITH 18% INTEREST P.A. ON THE APPENDING VEHICLE AND MODIFIED BY ENHANCING TO RS.13,47,940/- WITH INTEREST OF 18% PER ANNUM FOR THE DATE OF PETITION, TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT, BY HOLDING RESPONDENT HEREIN LIABLE TO PAY THE COMPENSATION, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) 1. The appeal was filed in the year 2024 and till now, office objections are not complied. 2. This Court does not find any grounds to grant further time. 3. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE RHR/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3