Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143692 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27310 of 2025 Petitioner :- Piyusha Pandey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kirt Raj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent No 2 Tahsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Phulpur, District Azamgarh to decide the proceeding of mutation Case No. 4035 of 2021 Computerize Case No. T202115060304035 dated 20.10.2021 (Piyusha Pandey and another Versus Urmila) Under section 34/35 Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 Mauja Khairuddeenpur Ali Azim Pargana Mahul Tahsil Phulpur District Azamgarh and any other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that mutation application was moved in the year 2021 which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. This Court on 02.07.2025 had required Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General to get instructions from State Government as to why petitions in such a large number are being filed in this Court for expediting mutation proceedings. 4. Pursuant to query made by this Court, learned Additional Advocate General placed before the Court the circular issued by State Government on 09.07.2025 wherein a direction has been issued by State Government to all Collectors of the State requiring Tehsildars and Sub Divisional Officers of the Tehsil and Division to conclude the mutation proceedings within the time period prescribed under the Code. 5. This Court requires that each and every Tehsildar and Sub Divisional Officer of the State should immediately comply the directions issued by State Government and in case the mutation applications are kept pending and are not decided within the time frame as provided under the Circular dated 09.07.2025 or as provided under the Code, 2006 or directed by this Court, it would amount to civil contempt under Section 2(e) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Without any further direction, the officer will be held disobedient of the order of this Court and would be guilty of contempt. 6. In view of said fact, respondent no. 2 is hereby directed to conclude the proceedings of Mutation Case No. 4035 of 2021 Computerize Case No. T202115060304035 (Piyusha Pandey and another vs. Urmila) positively within a period of three months, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties. 7. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad