- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17906 WP No. 108113 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 108113 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O. PUNDALIKAPPA TUBAKI AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/AT: VIVEKANAND ROAD, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, BAGEWADI BUILDING, GADAG, DIST-GADAG. 2. SRI SANTOSH S/O. PUNDALIKAPPA TUBAKI AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/AT: VIVEKANAND ROAD, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, BAGEWADI BUILDING, GADAG, DIST-GADAG …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MRUTYUNJAY T. BANGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA NIRAVARI NIGAM NIYAMIT R/BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR WALMI, BELUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, DHARWAD TQ. DIST. DHARWAD 580011. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER THE TUNGABHADRA RIVER, PROJECT CIRCLE MUNIRABAD, TQ. DIST. KOPPAL. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA NIRAVARI NIGAM LIMITED, SUB-DIVISION 2, AGALKERA, KOPPAL, TQ. DIST. KOPPAL RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.12.12 14:34:17 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17906 WP No. 108113 of 2025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAJASHEKHAR BURJI, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND DECIDE THE REPRESENTATION DATED. 26.05.2020 AS PER ANNEXURE-G FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT OF PETITIONER NO.2 WITHIN A FIXED TIME FRAME BY CONSIDERING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND CJM, KOPPAL IN RA NO.32/2016 AND ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 TO IMPLEMENT THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN RA NO.32/2016 FORTHWITH AS PER ANNEXURE-F, BY RELEASING ALL SERVICE, PENSIONARY, AND DEATH BENEFITS OF LATE PUNDALIKAPPA VITTAPPA TUBAKI IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER NO.1. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PARTLY IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17906 WP No. 108113 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the endorsement rejecting the petitioners’ claim for appointment on compassionate grounds was served on him along with the statement of objections. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and to challenge the said endorsement by filing a fresh petition. 3. The liberty so sought is granted. 4. All contentions are left open to be urged in the fresh petition that the petitioners intends to file. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE AC CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 219