Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8589 (ALL)

PRAHLAD SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

A483/90/2025 · 2025-01-31

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14841 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 90 of 2025 Applicant :- Prahlad Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rawati Raman Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case No.315 of 2021, arising out of case crime no. 126 of 2021, under Sections 323, 325, 504 IPC, Police Station Kachhwa, District Mirzapur pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (SD)-I, Mirzapur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the said case and same is pending since 2021 at the stage of evidence. It is also submitted that the opposite party nos.2 to 5 have appeared and obtained bail. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. It is also submitted that in this case even the informant has not been examined as PW-1 so far. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the case is pending at the stage of evidence. Hence, the trial court is directed to make all possible efforts to record the evidence of the informant as PW-1 within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter make all possible endeavours to dispose of the case under reference as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad