Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85879 (PNJ)

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS v. PARAMJIT SINGH

RFA/6756/2014 · 2025-07-25

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA State of Punjab and others Paramjit Singh CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-1746 representatives of the appellant accepts notice on behalf of the non objection against the prayer made in the application. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH State of Punjab and others Vs. Paramjit Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant(s)/landowners/ X-objectors/respondent(s). Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. (in RFA-10437-2014). Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) 1746-CI-2024 Prayer in the present application is for impleading the legal representatives of the appellant-Paramjit Singh, who died on 01.04.2021. Notice of the application. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant and raises no objection against the prayer made in the application. In view of the above, as well as averments made in the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-6756-2014 (O&M) with Cross objections No.61-CI--2016 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 .......... Appellants .......... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate, cate, for the appellant(s)/landowners/ objectors/respondent(s). Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab. Prayer in the present application is for impleading the legal Paramjit Singh, who died on 01.04.2021. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab applicant/appellant and raises no objection against the prayer made in the application. In view of the above, as well as averments made in the (O&M) with 2016 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 .......... Appellants .......... Respondent Prayer in the present application is for impleading the legal Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab applicant/appellant and raises no In view of the above, as well as averments made in the SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.08.05 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document application, the same is representatives of appellant, as ordered to be brought on record to pursue the present appeal. MAIN CASE No. 6957 of 2013 July 25, 2025 'Sumit Gusain' [2] application, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions and the legal representatives of appellant, as mentioned in para ordered to be brought on record to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to do the needful. MAIN CASE For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in o. 6957 of 2013 titled “Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others” July 25, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA) 'Sumit Gusain' Whether Speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable subject to all just exceptions and the legal mentioned in para-2 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in RFA “Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others”. ( HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No subject to all just exceptions and the legal 2 of the application, are RFA . SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.08.05 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document