Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85876 (MAD)

SAKTHI REALTY HOLDINGS LTD v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CMP/25252/2025 · 2025-10-23

G Arul Murugan

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025 in TCA SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025 in T.C.A. SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025 C.M.P.No.25252 of 2025: Sakthi Realty Holdings Ltd No.62, Nanjappa Road, Coimbatore – 641 018. Applicant Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle -2, 63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018. Respondent C.M.P.No.25268 of 2025: Tharanipathy Rajkumar 2-2, TSA Niayam, Thathur, Pollachi-642 104. Applicant Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-1, Coimbatore-641 108. Respondent ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025 in TCA SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025 For Applicant: M/s.Amritha Sathyajith For Respondent: Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun Kumar Sr. Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard. 2. These applications have been filed by the applicants to condone the delay of 6 days in filing the appeals. 3. Though learned counsel for the respondent opposes the applications and prays for time to file counter-affidavit, we are inclined to condone the delay, as the delay is of only 6 days. ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025 in TCA SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025 4. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the applications are allowed. List the appeals for admission. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 23.10.2025 bbr ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis