2025:JHHC:24756 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1399 of 2023 ---- Lal Dhananjay Nath Shahdeo, aged about 61 years, Son of Late Mangla Nath Shahdeo, resident of Kamta, P.O Chandwa, P.S Chandwa, District-Latehar …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, Latehar, P.O & P.S Latehar, District-Latehar 3. Superintendent of Police, Latehar, P.O & P.S Latehar, District-Latehar 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Latehar, P.O & P.S Latehar, District-Latehar 5. Circle Officer, Chandwa, P.O Chandwa, P.S. Chandwa, District-Latehar 6. Officer-in-Charge, Chandwa Police Station, Chandwa, P.O Chandwa, P.S. Chandwa, District-Latehar 7. Ram Kishun Oraon 8. Balkishun Oraon, both sons of Late Badsah Oraon, both resident of Village Hagar, Sonbitha, P.O Chandwa, P.S. Chandwa, District-Latehar …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Abhijeet Anand, AC to Sr. SC-I For the Resp. Nos.7 & 8 : Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate ---- 05/Dated: 21st August, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions issuing show cause to the respondent no.2 as to without hearing the petitioner why order contained in Memo No.1215, Law Dated 07.12.2022 (Annexure -8) has been passed by respondent no.2 denying police protection to the petitioner. (ii) Upon showing no cause or insufficient cause further be pleased to quash order contained in Memo No.1215, Law dated 07.12.2022 (Annexure-8) has been passed by respondent No.2 denying police protection to the petitioner. (iii) To direct the respondents particularly respondent no.2 for grant of police protection to the petitioner for cultivating his land situated at Mouza Nagar, Thana No.240, Khesra 08, 1.99 acres (Khata 2025:JHHC:24756 2. W.P.C No.1399 of 2023 No.69, Plot No. 798) Chandwa as there is serious threat of life, liberty and property of the petitioner.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to pursue his remedy in the pending appeal. 3. Learned counsels for the respondents have raised no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby, disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/- Uploaded