Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8586 (KAR)

KHAJASAB S/O. DAWALSAB BELERI v. SMT. BIBIJAN W/O DAWALSAB BELERI

WP/104796/2021 · 2025-02-12

Suraj Govindaraj

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2863 WP No. 104796 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104796 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. KAZASAB S/O. DAWALSAB BELERI AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOMBAL VILLAGE, TQ AND DIST. GADAG. 2. MUMTAZ BEGAUM D/O KAZASAB BELERI AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. HOMBAL VILLAGE, TQ AND DIST. GADAG. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. BIBIJAN W/O DAWALSAB BELERI AFTER SECOND MARRIAGE SMT. BIBIJAN W/O JAFARSAB BASAVANKOPP AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE WORK, R/O. HOSA SINGHATA LUR VILLAGE, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. GADAG. 2. JAFARSAB S/O DAWALSAB BASAVANKOPP AGE. MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOSA SIINGHATA LUR VILLAGE, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. GADAG. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.S. SHETTAR AND SMT. KAVYA C., ADVOCATES FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 08.09.2021 PASSED BY I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC I, GADAG IN O.S.NO.351/2015 ON I.A.NO.10 VIDE ANNEXURE-H. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2863 WP No. 104796 of 2021 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: I. A writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 08.09.2021 passed by I Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC I, Gadag in O.S.No.351/2015 on I.A.No.10 vide Annexure-H. II. Issue such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case. 2. Despite order dated 25.01.2025, learned counsel for petitioners has not complied the office objection. Hence, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE CKK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 56