Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010044782025 2025:GAU-AS:4731 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/856/2025 RUNU LALUNG AND ORS W/O LATE DEBA LALUNG, R/O VILL-LALUNG KAPAHTALI, P.S.- SILAPATHAR, DIST-DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN-787059 2: MISS PARISHMITA LALUNG D/O LATE DEBA LALUNG R/O VILL-LALUNG KAPAHTALI P.S.-SILAPATHAR DIST-DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787059 3: MINTU LALUNG S/O LATE DEBA LALUNG R/O VILL-LALUNG KAPAHTALI P.S.-SILAPATHAR DIST-DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787059 4: BIDYUT LALUNG S/O LATE DEBA LALUNG R/O VILL-LALUNG KAPAHTALI P.S.-SILAPATHAR DIST-DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787059 (MINOR BEING REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER APPLICANT NO. 1 VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD AND ORS A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 REP BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER ULUBARAI GUWAHATI 7 Page No.# 2/3 2:LAKHI DASGUPTA S/O INDRA DIHINGIA R/O KENDUGURI GAON P.S.-DHEMAJI DIST-DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787059 3:SITA RAM S/O BHAGIRATH RAM R/O GELASAR THE MAKRANA DIST-NAGPUR RAJASTHAN PIN-341001 4:JHUMAR LAL S/O SRI GHISA RAM R/O THE MARKANA 211 DEGHA KALLAN DIST-NAGPUR MARKANA RAJASTHAN PIN-341001 5:UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. REPRESENTED BY REGIONAL MANAGER G.S. ROAD ABC GUWAHATI- Advocate for the Petitioner : BIKASH KUMAR, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S K GOSWAMI, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 21-04-2025 Heard Mr. U. Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant. I have also heard Mr. S. K. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 1/ Insurance company. Page No.# 3/3 By an order dated 11.05.2022, passed in I.A.(Civil)/1310/2022, this Court while staying the operation of the impugned order has directed the opposite party/Insurance company to deposit 50% of the awarded amount in MAC case no. 06/2018 before the Registry. In compliance of the said direction the opposite party/Insurance company has deposited 50% of the awarded amount before the Registry. By filing this application, the claimant/respondent prays for release of the 50% of the awarded amount deposited by the appellant/opposite party. Mr. S. K. Goswami, learned counsel for the opposite party/Insurance company raised objection to the said prayer. Upon hearing the parties, the prayer of the applicant is allowed. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to release 50% of the awarded amount deposited by the opposite party/Insurance company to the applicant on execution of a bond of the like amount and on proper identification and verification by their learned counsel. With the above this IA stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant