UMAR KHALEEL NEDOU v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (TOURISM DEPARTMENT) (Gulmarg Development Authority)
WP(C)/1899/2025 · 2025-08-12
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8585 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8585 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1899/2025 CM(5016/2025)
Umar Khaleel Nedou …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: Mr. Zaffar Shah, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate Mr. Syed Faisal Qadri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Salih Pirzada, Advocate & Mr. Sikander Hyaat Khan, Advocate
Vs. Union Territory of J and K and Ors ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, GA & Mr. Faheem Nissar Shah, GA CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 12-08-2025
At the outset, learned senior Additional Advocate General has shared with us the copies of the two communications of an even date i.e., August 11, 2025, vide which Naib Tehsildar, Tangmarg, had conveyed the Tehsildar that letter No. 136/NTT dated 30th April, 2025 issued by him has since been cancelled/withdrawn. And, as a consequence, even the Tehsildar, Tangmarg informed the Deputy Commissioner, Baramulla that since the Naib Tehsildar, Tangmarg had withdrawn/cancelled the letter dated 30th April, 2025 (ibid), he, too, has cancelled/withdrawn the letter No. TTNG/OQ/2025/153 dated 30th April, 2025. Both the letters (ibid) are retained on record as marked ‘X’ and ‘Y’.
However, during the resumed hearing, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits for he has specific instructions not to pursue the matter any further, he be permitted to withdraw the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
SRINAGAR 12-08-2025 Aamir
Amir Rashid Sofi I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 13.08.2025 12:45